This page honors the individuals and families whose stories, faith, and generosity helped build Christ the King Church—physically, spiritually, and financially.
April 27, 2026
From: Martha and Anthony Belluschi FAIA
Pietro Belluschi's Son and Daughter-in-Law
Architect Pietro Belluschi was known for working with parish leadership and members to understand their spiritual needs and religious symbols. He listened and took what he heard to design spiritual spaces specific to each parish. His buildings make use of local materials and fine craftsmanship to create eloquent but subdued places of inspiration and peace. He designed 42 churches and synagogues around our country that are timeless in their style of elegant simplicity. The structures are still loved, appreciated and revered through the years.
In our travels, we have spontaneously stopped by several Belluschi-designed churches. We are amazed but humbled by the significance each congregation gives to the importance of their sacred and inspirational space, and to their architect. Often a church will even have a table with articles and materials about Pietro set aside to show their appreciation for their Belluschi design.
It is heartening to see the Testimonials on this site, with parish members describing the meaning, history and legacy for them of Christ the King Church, including their participation in its creation and their specific fond memories. The story of the parish members working to create the beautiful stained glass starry firmament and Cross is meaningful. The artist, Gyorgy Kepes, also designed the cherished stained glass for Portsmouth Abbey in Rhode Island, the Cathedral of St. Mary of the Assumption in San Francisco and numerous other Belluschi-designed churches.
The current proposed "beautification" plans, ignore the significance of the legacy, history and heritage of CTK. The plans ignore the talent, expertise and vision of architect, Pietro Belluschi, the only Oregonian to ever receive the National Medal of Arts and the American Institute of Architects Gold Medal. The plans ignore the value of the Pacific Northwest style of architecture and use of local materials which are part of history for both the Archdiocese of Portland and the state of Oregon.
We encourage careful and serious consideration of the issues brought forth on this site for truly preserving CTK.
Martha and Anthony Belluschi FAIA
Pietro Belluschi's Son and Daughter-in-Law
July 15, 2026
University of Washington, Professor of Architecture
To: Committee to Preserve Christ the King Church
Fr: Ann Marie Borys, PhD, FAIA
I am a Professor of Architecture at the University of Washington, and I did extensive research on
mid-century church architecture while writing a book, American Unitarian Churches, published in
2021. Among other things that I discovered in this work, I was inspired by the passion and
commitment of mid-century congregations that worked closely with significant architects to realize
a meaningful and beautiful design to inspire all who may visit and to leave a lasting legacy.
I visited Belluschi’s Unitarian (now Unitarian Universalist) churches in Bethesda MD, Syracuse NY,
and Rockford IL and studied in detail the documents that recorded the congregations’ vision and
subsequent attachment to the churches that they fostered into being. In each case, Pietro
Belluschi was praised for his responsive attitude toward open dialogue with church members on
their values, beliefs, and vision for the design of their church, and how he succeeded in honoring
their unique character in the final design. It seems that the post-war Catholic congregation of Christ
the King was similarly deeply involved and must be credited with achieving such a worthy goal. To
erase their whole-hearted gifts of money, time, and labor would violate the trust that those donors
expected from the congregation and the Catholic church that they cared about so profoundly.
Belluschi’s buildings in the Pacific Northwest have cultural significance beyond the beauty that they
provided for the clients that commissioned him; they are central to the establishment of the PNW
design ethos that has carried through to this day: working with natural resources, preserving
natural features of the landscape and fitting a building within; and understanding the unique effects
of natural light in this region and its role in elevating the experience of building interiors.
We are now in a time of renewed appreciation of the value of natural wood in our built
environments: it brings the soothing, even therapeutic, presence of a walk in the woods to our
interior spaces. Many renovations are being undertaken to replace masonry and metal finishes
with the warmth and texture of wood. It would be a shame to abandon something so valuable that
Christ the King has enjoyed since its founding.
The post-war period was a time of spiritual renewal; it is speculated that the horrors of World War II
stimulated the church-building boom in America. Many churches of all denominations were built in
the 1950’s and 1960’s. Their simplicity and clarity of space and construction together express an
awareness of technology’s dangers and a desire for optimism leavened with humility. The design
of Christ the King was conceived in a national moment of spiritual focus on community over
elaborate material embellishment. Any renovation needed should preserve the evidence of this`
important period of the history of religion in America.
July 4, 2026
Architectural History Professor Emerita and Author of “Spiritual Space: The Religious Architecture of Pietro Belluschi” and “Pietro Belluschi: Modern American Architect”:
To: Save Christ the King Church in Milwaukee, Ore (1978-80)
Meredith L. Clausen Professor Emerita of Architectural History, Univ of Washington
4july26
Dear Save the Christ the King church Committee and the congregation,
As a professor now emerita of architectural history at the University of Washington and author of Spiritual Space: the Religious Architecture of Pietro Belluschi, I urge you to do what you can to preserve Christ the King church in its original state. Eminent architect, renowned for buildings around the world, Belluschi began his practice in the Pacific Northwest, then moved to Boston to become Dean of the School of Architecture and Urban Planning at MIT, meantime designing prominent buildings such as the Pan Am (later, MetLife) Building in New York, the Julliard School of Music in Lincoln Center, Bank of America in San Francisco, among many, many others. Despite these major accomplishments, he was known especially for his small, seemingly hand-crafted churches in the Pacific Northwest.
Christ the King was one of his personal favorite among the later churches, as it had a serenity, a peace and unity about it only occasionally have architects been able to achieve. With overtones of his St Mary’s Cathedral in San Francisco, the centralized plan bringing the congregation around the altar in a more open, accessible manner than the traditional longitudinal nave of the Catholic church, the inspiration of magnificent churches such as Hagia Sophia in Istanbul, with its high, ribbed dome raised on a ring of lights at its base so that it seems to hover overhead, and the Pantheon in Rome with its brilliant, light-emitting oculus overhead, the whole structure capped by a great pyramidal roof inspired by traditional Japanese architecture that gives a sense of shelter as well as unity -- all this and more brilliantly synthesized and translated into the language of the Pacific Northwest with its legacy of indigenous Native American traditions.
All this would be lost with the proposed mutilations, most especially painting over the stunning woodwork that does so much to evoke the natural world so important to Oregonians. The unique character of the church will be destroyed, and once gone it can never be replaced – the natural world, the sense of community and oneness among members of the congregation, the serenity and sense of spiritual peace and harmony.
Do your best, please, to save it as it is, as it is a priceless, irreplaceable jewel.
Meredith L. Clausen
Professor Emerita, University of Washington
July 4, 2026
Painter Preservation: Historic Preservation & Urban Design; Owner/Principal Architectural Historian:
To: Committee to Preserve Christ the King Church
I am writing to express my dismay at the interior changes that are planned for Pietro Belluschi’s Christ the King Catholic Church in Milwaukie, Oregon, as well as my support for the Committee to Preserve Christ the King Church. Milwaukie, the congregation of Christ the King, and the Portland metropolitan area have an absolute treasure in this beautiful, intact church by Belluschi, who was one of our country’s finest modern architects. The visually stunning colored glass cross by renowned designer, artist and visual theorist Gyorgy Kepes is equally significant.
Pietro Belluschi is recognized for his modern churches in particular, having designed 42 churches and synagogues in his career, the most well known likely being St. Mary of the
Assumption Cathedral in San Francisco (Kepes also designed the stained glass for this building). In reading the history of Christ the King Church I was additionally impressed by the involvement of the parishioners in the development of their church, which speaks to its
importance to the people it serves.
Creating a Romanesque interior desecrates the design of this church and will result in a jarring, incongruous design statement. The comment by pastor John Cihak that the wood
grain showing through the planned painted ceiling (it is natural wood now) will recall the building’s Northwest roots is a feeble reference. The Northwest Regional Style, which is
reflected in this building, is a style developed by Belluschi and his colleagues characterized by natural materials, natural finishes, and simplicity of form and detailing. The fact that the planned changes will mean that the building’s interior and exterior are no longer consistent is also deeply problematic.
The Hungarian Kepes’ seminal Architecture of Vision was highly influential to me in my undergraduate education in design. I am an architectural historian whose 1990 PhD focused in part on modern design. I have specialized in modern architectural design in the Pacific Northwest, which is where I am from, and on the west coast for the last 24 years. I also had the privilege of writing the National Register nomination for Pietro Belluschi’s last residence (also designed by him), in which Belluschi’s son Anthony and his wife Marti now reside.
I sincerely hope that the church will reconsider their design plans and make any maintenance-related updates in a way that honors the design and history of this beautiful building that is also an integral part of this neighborhood and parish.
Sincerely,
Diana J. Painter, PhD
Owner/Principal Architectural Historian
July 4,2026
Former parishioners:
My wife and I want to thank you for your coverage in the Oregonian of the radical makeover being proposed by the pastor of Christ the King Catholic Parish for the church altar, sacristy and educational program. As former CTK parishioners, we are appalled that such an elegantly simple and beautiful church would be "romanized" to the tune of several millions of dollars. About 10 years ago, we were donors to the much needed new parish center built under the guidance of Fr. Paperini, and in fact, our 50th wedding anniversary celebration was the first event to be held in that building in July of 2017. Shortly after that, with the arrival of a new pastor, we sensed a noticeable change in the church's openness, inclusivity, and welcoming atmosphere, so we, along with several other family members, left for a different parish. It was not an easy decision, as six of our grandchildren had attended CTK over the years, but the change of emphasis in the elementary school curriculum led our daughter to leave CTK and enroll her girls in a new parish school.
Several months ago when we received in the mail a donation appeal for the proposed makeover, we were shocked and appalled, not only at the proposed changes, but the amount of money requested for the altar remodel ($2.45M), remodel of sacristies ($2.75M), and the expansion of the school to a K-12 academic program ($500K). Beyond the needlessness of these changes to a perfectly functional, humble, and historic house of worship, is the obscene cost of the plan. Just 3 miles north of the church on 82nd Ave. is Francis Center, a Catholic charity that provides food, clothing, and living assistance to local residents in desperate need. Almost every time I have gone to this charity to donate clothing, I have seen lines of people waiting to get food, household goods, or clothing, all assisted by volunteers from other local parishes. We are absolutely mystified by the notion that a church that purports to feed the hungry, house the homeless, clothe the needy can see fit to squander over $5M to gussy up a church for some wealthy patrons. We are equally incredulous that, in the face of the rampant homelessness in our community, the Catholic Archdiocese could put its stamp of approval on such a self-indulgent venture. The project and process represent everything that is wrong with the institutional church in this country. today. Francis Center is a model of what Christianity ought to be and where Christ would be serving his flock.
As for the $500K to expand the K-12 curriculum, the CTK parish property abuts that of La Salle Catholic College Prep right next door on the same street!! With three large Catholic high schools in the metro area, what possible purpose is served putting another high school (grades 9-12) adjacent to a highly regarded Christian Brothers facility?
We sincerely hope the Christ the King Preservation Committee is successful in stopping this needless "Romanesque" makeover of an elegantly simple and historically significant house of worship. It may also save the archdiocese the embarrassment of having approved the lavish makeover of such a church in the face of glaring poverty and homelessness in the surrounding community.
May 2, 2026
From: Bill Tripp, Local Architect who has worked on Pietro Belluschi buildings
Letter of Support for Preserving Christ the King Catholic Church
Our firm was the architect for an extensive renovation and remodel of Pietro Belluschi’s Central Lutheran Church in Portland. I am very familiar with Belluschi’s architectural language and the process of working with a parish to undertake such a major effort.
What strikes me about the renderings of the remodel is that it proposes to remake the walls of the building out of stone. Since the existing building is made of lightweight wood construction this would require substantial structural changes to bear the stone’s weight and seismic loads, an enormous undertaking.
The architectural qualities of a church, or any building for that matter, are not decided by the architect alone. They grow out of the circumstances that create it: the hopes and dreams of the people, the goals and finances of the parish community, and the place in which it is built. Belluschi and the Parish decided upon using local materials and building traditions which are both efficient and economical. Have the circumstances of Christ the King parish changed so much that a stone church is now the best option?
Of course, if the intention is to create an interior constructed of lightweight materials made to look like stone, then this approach forsakes the integrity and authenticity of Belluschi’s architecture for mere applied imagery. The human senses of sound, temperature, weight, and even the smell of stone would be denied and the space experienced as false, uncomfortable, and disconcerting.
Preserving the architectural integrity of Christ the King church is important out of respect for all the hard work that parish members dedicated to its design and construction and the memories and family stories that reside there.
This does not mean that the church is forever frozen in time. The question of how to accommodate change while respecting the existing building lies at the core of the process. What is currently being proposed is from another time and place altogether. What is needed is a design guided by respect and an ongoing dedication to authenticity, the very essence of Pietro Belluschi’s architecture.
Sincerely,
Bill Tripp
April 9, 2026
To: The leadership of Christ the King (CTK) Parish and the leadership of the Archdiocese
From: Frank Altenhofen, a concerned member of our diocese
To provide some context for my comments…
1. I am a member of a large Portland Catholic family, born and raised in Portland. Many generations of our family have, and still do, participate vigorously in parishes in the archdiocese.
2. I am a long-term member of the Portland Catholic community, and currently our family are active members of an adjacent parish, and other local parishes.
3. I am a graduate of our local Catholic grade school, LaSalle High School, and the University of Portland.
4. Our family members include priests, deacons, and religious, who were trained locally, and many assigned to local parishes and ministries.
5. My family members were long term members of CTK parish, and several of our children were educated at CTK.
6. I am a former member of the CTK Administrative Council.
7. I am currently an active member of our parish and the St. Vincent de Paul Society in Portland.
As a former member of the CTK Admin Council, I cannot imagine that spending millions of dollars for adding a high school at CTK (LaSalle HS is next door!) is the best use of resources. There must be many, and much more appropriate, uses for capital funds! Does the school not have capital projects in need of funding? I know that our parish is always in need of funds for typical maintenance projects.
The current CTK church is beautiful! It is my strong belief that the proposed projects for K-12 expansion and church "Beautification" are unnecessary and wasteful. I’ve had conversations with other CTK and former CTK parishioners. The feedback from them has overwhelmingly been that this is truly wasteful and a disgrace.
Our Pope Leo would surely wonder why these initiatives are being proposed, especially when he has come from parishes that had very meager funds to manage their mission. (Perhaps, we can send excess funds to more needy dioceses in our world? Or, perhaps use funds to provide tuition assistance to existing schools in our area?)
What would Jesus think? What would Jesus say? What would Jesus do? These are the questions that I believe we should reflect upon.
I certainly hope for a reevaluation of the proposed massively expensive expansion and “Beautification” proposals.
~Frank
Brian Libby:
This seems like a cruel joke. The idea of desecrating an authentic and wonderful design by Oregon's greatest-ever architect, Pietro Belluschi, in order to misguidedly try and cobble together a faux-historic replacement is a mistake of tragic proportions. In fact, it's not just a mistake. It's a great sin. That it would be committed by religious leaders makes this crisis all the more disappointing of a moral failure. I urge Christ the King not to commit this self-inflicted wound, and to instead see the light.
Stuart Emmons, FAIA (Fellow of the American Institute Architects, the groups highest membership honor):
I am appalled by the destruction proposed by the Christ the King Church. The Catholic Church has a history of supporting the Arts and Architecture for centuries. To defile this internationally significant piece of Pietro Belluschi architecture is just un-Christian, and makes the Christ the King Church parish look mean-spirited and ill informed. Don't do it!
Stephanie Brown:
Several years ago, I had the honor of authoring the guide booklet for a "Sacred Spaces of Pietro Belluschi" tour and photographing each of the churches featured on that tour. Having taught History of Architecture at the college level, I came to that project already well-acquainted with Belluschi's legacy, but largely through his residential work. Experiencing his religious architecture firsthand was something else entirely: I was especially struck by how seamlessly these buildings wove together architecture and art, light and shadow, color and texture, utilizing natural materials to create spaces that felt at once deeply human and accessible yet quietly otherworldly. We are extraordinarily fortunate in the Pacific Northwest to have such a remarkable collection of Belluschi churches still standing. It would be a profound loss to see Christ the King — with its handcrafted details and luminous Kepes Cross — altered beyond recognition or lost to renovation. And given that this parish serves a neighborhood with truly pressing needs, including food insecurity — it is hard to understand the wisdom in directing millions of dollars toward unnecessary cosmetic changes when so many living in the community this church was built to serve are in need.
Current parishioner:
I have been sick about this move since it was first mentioned. It puzzles me that our pastor has such power over the congregation that he can convince them of the "need" to change the church so drastically. He has already made so many changes that some might find it hard to think it is the same building. For some reason, I believe that he has had major changes in mind from the beginning but he had to groom the right followers to get it done. He is only going to be here for a few more years but, if any of us long time parishioners stay, we will be stuck with his abomination forever. I have seriously viewed this move since it was announced as more of a legacy move than a real, honest need. It just fits with his frequent reminders of his time at the Vatican with the popes and his meeting Mother Teresa. Why do we need to be reminded of that more than once let alone several times each year as part of his homilies? I hope that your efforts aren't too late to head this off.
In addition, I am getting tired of being told that the way that I have worshipped since childhood is wrong, I am 77, the way that I receive communion is wrong, the Latin music that is forced on us, the ostentatiousness, all of it. Why should I have to find another parish and leave the one that I have lived within five minutes of for 38 years when he is only here temporarily?
Thank you for anything that you are able to accomplish.
Past parishioner:
I am a former 32-year member of Christ the King Parish. My husband and I joined Christ the King because of the joy we felt from the parishioners and clergy the first time we attended Mass there. They were a family and welcomed everyone. Our children attended Christ the King school. I was a six-year school board member and then joined the school staff for 17 years. My husband was a sacristan, Eucharistic Minister, member of the pastoral council, trustee of the Chiossi Trust, parish center building committee member and member of the Knights of Columbus. Our grandchildren were baptized and received their First Eucharist there. Christ the King parish was truly our home where we were deeply involved.
And now, Msgr. Cihak has inaugurated a “beautification project.” But Christ the King Church is and always has been a beautiful place to worship. Entering, you can’t help but catch your breath when you see the beautiful stained glass cross that is simple, yet awe-inspiring. One immediately feels God’s presence. If this cross is removed and the church turned into a NW Romanesque style, it would be a travesty and loss to the integrity, beauty and history of Christ the King Church.
When the term “beautification” is used for the changes to be made, who is defining beauty? Why would someone feel that making a drastic change to an artist’s work is making it more beautiful? Architect Pietro Belluschi designed it for the parishioners in a true NW style. All churches do not need to look like the ones in Europe. They are beautiful where they are, as are other styles of churches. Christ the King now has calmness for worship and prayer. Some maintenance and updating may need to be done, but not a complete revision from the original artist’s work. The money that is projected to be spent is for superficial design and not true necessity. One million dollars will be taken from the Chiossi Trust for use in the “beautification.” This trust was established by a former parishioner with the stipulation that it only be used for needed maintenance of the existing structure. Beautification does not fit under maintenance. It is my prayer that Msgr. Cihak, his building committee and the Archdiocese all reconsider how this “beautification” project will destroy a truly beautiful piece of the history of our Catholic community in the Archdiocese of Portland in Oregon.
Pat Kirk:
As a 91-year-old former CTK parishioner and employee, I was profoundly saddened to read about the renovation plans for the Church. I was employed there as Parish Secretary for many years, during the time Mass was celebrated in the school gymnasium, and building a "new church" was a dream until the dream became a long-awaited reality.
I remember the many "Building Committee" meetings held to interview prospective architects, and the ultimate hiring of internationally known master architect Pietro Belluschi. To alter the interior design of this historic Church by painting over much of the wood, creating arches, and removing the cross of light above the altar (designed by Gyorgy Kepes) would be such a travesty - not a beautification but an uglification.
I would urge people to read about Pietro Belluschi, as well as Gyorgy Kepes, to more fully understand why there is such a great effort to preserve the Church as it is.
Community member:
This renovation is a symptom of a larger problem in the Archdiocese of Portland, a problem embodied by Archbishop Sample and certain members of the clergy, like Monsignor Cihak. They want to take the church back to the 1940s, to a time when women in the church were seen and not heard, and when gay and trans people were in the closet because technically, "gay and trans people didn't exist." They dream of a time when the parish priest's authority, a top-down hierarchy, wasn't ever questioned. They want to return to the days when women wore veils in Mass and there were no girls on the altar. (Heaven forbid!) For the Archbishop and his ilk, Vatican II never happened.
It's in this context, in one of the most unchurched states, and liberal cities in the country that Monsignor Cihak thought he could just work with a few wealthy parishioners to push his renovation through with no resistance from parishioners. He did this with minimal, if any understanding of the parish's history, it's foundation. CTK is a parish built, literally, by the founding parish families, many, if not most of them blue-collar. There is a lot of history, pride and ownership embedded in the very bones of this parish.
In a time of declining church attendance why did he think this was a good idea?
In a time of declining numbers of school-aged children, he thinks it's a good time to start a high school, right next door to a well-established and highly regarded Catholic high school (La Salle)?
What kind of boneheaded nonsense is this?
Clearly, there is a very limited understanding of what it takes to run a school, let alone start one from scratch.
Read the room, fellas!
The word "Catholic" means, literally, universal. It is derived from the Greek word "katholikos" meaning "according to the whole," or "regarding the whole." The Catholic church, flawed as it is, is supposed to be a welcoming place. A big tent, if you will. Well, the Archbishop and Monsignor Cihak are small tent Catholics and they are only hurting this parish and the broader Catholic community in Portland.
Current parishioner:
I have been a member of the parish for 38 years and have grown to love the simplicity of this holy space. At no time have I ever found it lacking in the inspirational setting that we are being told about. This effort shows a total lack of true understanding of the purpose of a parish. Rather than desecrating this holy and beautiful place of worship, the pastor should be finding ways to inspire parishioners through works of mercy and support of the many needy of our area. Many of my relatives have been inspired by our church when they have visited and have been flabbergasted and perplexed when I mention this initiative. It is probably too late to put a stop to this misguided effort but there is always hope that the Lord will change some thinking before it is too late.
Current parishioner:
I am a long-time parishioner of CTK. I was confirmed there, my mom used to run the flower ministry, I used to help teach bible study to the elementary students + attended youth groups. I am wholly against the makeover and my parents are also appalled by the sheer amount of money being put into the church to not only just slap some white paint, but to also add an entire high school to CTK when La Salle is right next door. Msgr. Cihak personally sent a letter asking my parents to donate tens of thousands of dollars. I think it's terrible that we are throwing out the legacy of such a renowned architect and we should do things to help the church structurally or add buildings if capacity needs it. But to ruin the wood and careful choices of a midcentury modern project seems redundant and wasteful to me. I wish that money was refocused to paying church volunteers, beautifying church grounds, updating offices or the current school buildings, or even campaigns towards the lower income community surrounding our church.
Community member:
I'm an architect and would like to express my concern that inserting a romanesque decorative scheme into the interior of a rigorously modern building is unlikely to be visually successful. Monsignor Cihak is quoted as referencing several nearby churches with romanesque elements as justification for this change, but all of these churches are designed in a historic style throughout. Their beauty comes from their overall cohesiveness. I urge the parish to consider the integrity and elegance of Belluschi's modern design and work with that rather than against it.
Past parishioner:
I grew up at Christ the King and attended the school for multiple years. I was an altar server and my family was heavily involved in the community. I remember Helping Hands, the Fun Fest, and many other great memories of my childhood at the parish. I oppose the changes and do not think this is a responsible way to allocate money, especially when neighboring St. John the Baptist Catholic School just closed its doors.
Past parishioner:
CTK was my parish from childhood through my college years, and I always liked its unique design compared to the typical Romanesque or Gothic churches. Destroying the original interior would be like torching a Frank Lloyd Wright house. Milwaukie is not Vatican City, and there are many other better uses for nearly $5 million- it's telling that only 25% of the CTK families contributed to the capital campaign.
Local Architect:
As a retired Portland architect with family and design roots in the earlier era of Belluschi’s church work, I strongly urge the current parish leadership to redirect their current building “beautification” efforts. That Belluschi returned to Portland after retiring from a nationally recognized design career and was asked by local architects to collaborate on several church projects, including Christ the King, indicate the widely-recognized significance of his church designs in Oregon. Rather than paint over the rich woodwork in the sanctuary with stylistic flourishes completely unrelated to the original design, the parish would do a much greater service to the already beautiful building by restoring the existing finishes where needed, thereby preserving the regional character and liturgical significance of the original church design.
Past parishioner:
I grew up attending Christ the King church, was baptized and received my first communion there. My family attended daily mass for many years when I was a small child. As a lover of history, architecture, art, and a firm believer in social justice over ostentatious displays of wealth, I was also horrified to learn about this ridiculous proposal to renovate CTK. I wanted to express my deep appreciation for the summary on your website explaining the many reasons to oppose to renovation, both artistic/historical and dare I say political. The Krepes altar cross and the beautiful natural wood were my favorite things about the church, and I truly cant imagine the arrogance it would take to willingly paint over it. The community surrounding CTK, as you mentioned, deserve service, not yet another visual reminder that there is so much wealth in the world - just not for them. There are far better and more Christian ways to spend the proposed $6.5 mill and I applaud your work to oppose this plan. I hope you are successful.
Community member:
I am so sad to hear about this. CTK parish has a beautiful church that is peaceful and prayerful as well as reflective of our Pacific Northwest. I was unaware of the history of its construction. At a time of shrinking budgets and real needs, it is distressing to hear about 6million dollars being spent to indulge a few people’s idea of “beauty”. The church is beautiful as it is and the planned improvements seem terribly disrespectful. As a Milwaukie Catholic, I am truly sorry to hear this news.
Community member:
While I attend St. Michael The Archangel Catholic Church, I am a local Architect and I support the preservation of the original Belluschi design. I echo the sentiments of my fellow practitioners (Bill Tripp and Brian Libby foremost among them) with regards to the historic architectural importance, the regional place-based success of the Belluschi design and the falsity of materiality in the proposed design, but I would also add that the Catholic Church, throughout its long life, has subsumed and should continue to subsume art and by extension larger cultural artifacts within itself. This has allowed both the artistic and spiritual imagination of congregations to flourish. Pope Benedict XVI (then Cardinal Ratzinger) in The Spirt of the Liturgy enjoins us to create architecture in which "both the fidelity to the gift already bestowed and the dynamism of going forward are given equal expression." By turning its back on new forms of artistic expression, the Catholic Church risks becoming static and sanitized. Worse yet, it may appear stale to those who are most in need of its living dynamism. If the Church can subsume an ancient pagan typology such as the basilican form without corruption then surely it can do the same with a Modernist one. Especially one so highly regarded as the Pietro Belluschi design for Christ the King.
Community member:
I sincerely disagree with the planned Beautification Plans
for CTK’s church. This is a personal affront to the many that invested and supported the CTK church and its purpose over the last half century. It feels like it is being done to assuage the current pastor’s ego and is out of alignment with the needs of the church and community. In addition, it is a poor use of limited resources - the sparse design of the church was intentional and slapping Romanesque styles onto what is intended to beautifully simple is just misguided thinking and disrespectful to its founders and designers.
And, I would add, the plan to add grades 9-12 to CTK is equally misguided and a waste of limited resources when there is a well-respected and high-functioning catholic high school literally within 100 yards of the CTK site. Instead of building walls between the two schools and Romanesque features to its church to isolate itself, parish leadership should put their efforts into meaningful and win-win partnership opportunities for the two schools but I’m afraid the current pastor’s self-centeredness clouds his judgement and that of those that look up to him in that leadership role. In a time that the world needs to find unity, this leadership is focused on divisiveness that serves the minority that the pastor seeks to influence. I certainly question these decisions but more directly question the true intentions of those making these decisions. A rooted and humble leader would honor the simplicity and focus their efforts on a more important agenda that truly serves its parishioners.
Community member:
It's wrong to call this project a "renovation" and "beautification" as it is anything but that. These changes would essentially destroy a Belluschi treasure. It's a terrible shame that the church leaders do not recognize what a treasure this church is. Further, I'm appalled to learn that the architect isn't even based in the Pacific NW and presumably has no ties to this region. Please do not allow this heartbreaking destruction to happen.
Community member:
This proposal to "Romanesque" the church is just as "convincing" and ill-conceived as Trump's gilded makeover of the White House. Gold is more representative of American ideals; Romanesque is closer to the gate to heaven. Wow! I encourage people to watch this presentation by Anthony Belluschi which deals with Pietro Belluschi's religious architecture and the religious beliefs that are imbued in that architecture. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vLKVSV9aS5M I'm pretty sure the Pope would be appalled.
Community member:
I'm an architect and this proposed interior renovation completely disregards the original design of the building. They are proposing an interior that conforms with classic catholic architecture in a postmodern PNW building. There are plenty of examples of catholic churches with modern interiors. Examples: https://www.archdaily.com/984046/sacred-modernity-an-exploration-of-the-modernist-movement-in-mid-century-holy-architecture If this renovation happens the exterior and interior of the building will be in total contrast and will feel weird on top of the disregard for the historic importance of the building.
Community member:
I agree with this petition. The original is a historic building by a famous NW architect and the cross by famous artist and beloved by the parish that created it. It seems like routine maintenance and restoration would be both more appropriate and cheaper than the tacky "NW Romanesque style", which will not age well, and would allow for needed neighborhood outreach in these extremely difficult times. Thank you for considering.
Community member:
I attended Portsmouth Abbey School in Portsmouth, RI, a Benedictine monastery school whose church was also designed by the marvelous Pietro Belluschi. The spiritual and revelatory experiences I felt while worshipping in that space were unrivaled. It hurts me greatly to hear of the unwarranted attack on the beautiful and poignant design of Christ the King Church. I pray that your parish leadership can come to appreciate the spiritual significance of the space, the sacrifice of its original patrons, and the importance of architectural complexities as found in John’s gospel: “my Father’s house has many rooms”.
Community member:
This is a vanity project that puts the likes of the few over the efforts of the many. Don't we as a church have better things to do with limited funds then use them to alienate a good portion of the local catholic faithful when the metro-area, the nation, and the world abound with a lack of help for the needy.
Past Parishioner:
We were parishioners of this parish for many years and all three of our children attended Christ the king Parish school from kindergarten through eighth grade. I find this sad and upsetting. This money could be used in so many better ways to improve the lives of people in need or within the community. This has been monsignor‘s wish since he came to CTK and started to change everything, and not for the better. Many left the school and parish.
Community member:
When I learned of this controversy, I started doing some background reading about the architect, and the sculptor of the stained glass Cross. What I found was truly surprising. Mr. Belluschi is one of the finest architects in American history, not as well known as Frank Lloyd Wright, but certainly worth his company. Additionally, Mr. Belluschi was mentored by no less an architect then AE Doyle, Portland’s finest. But beyond all the credentials, it is a beautiful, welcoming space. Every building goes through a period of time, where it seems behind the times and out of date. If one waits an additional 30 years, people will be grateful that it wasn’t changed. That certainly true at Christ the King. I got to know the leadership of the landmarks preservation commission in New York City many years ago. I got to see what happens when well meaning committees decide to make changes that seem important, but nonetheless will find out 50 years from now that it was a mistake and try to restore it to its original vision.
Community member:
I am a lifelong Catholic and member of another parish in the Portland Archdiocese. I pray that the Holy Spirit guides CTK's leadership to re-evaluate their plans and motivation for the expensive and unnecessary redesign of the church. It doesn't seem like something that is in the best interest of the parish community.
Community member:
Though I don't live in the area or attend the church, I would like to submit a plea for preserving this beautiful interior created by renowned artists. I attended Zion Lutheran Church by Providence Park, Portland, and marveled at the design of the church also done by Piertro Belluschi. Yes, the interior is brown, but it has beauty, character, and thought put into the design. The new design, while brighter, is normal and not full of character as the present interior which highlights the intent of the architect through the structure. I have never seen Christ the King Church in person, but the photos that I saw of the altar amaze me! What a gorgeous backdrop with the stained glass and the cross! It is mesmerizing to look at even in a photo! Please don't remove such a glorious art piece that does better and in such a beautiful way than most church interiors do in drawing your eye to the cross where Jesus sacrificed his life for us.
Past parishioner:
I was a longtime member of Christ the King Parish and contributed to the building of the church. I am saddened to hear about the planned changes to the interior of the beautiful sanctuary where I worshiped for years. Pietro Belluschi, a noted Oregonian, was a nationally recognized, award-winning architect and colleague of Frank Lloyd Wright. To carry out their plans is a sacrilege.
Current parishioner:
This "renovation" should be lead by a historic preservation consultant. SHPO should be involved in this.
Current parishioner:
I attended CTK for church and grade school. It is a beautiful church, and doesn’t need a renovation to be more beautiful. It is fitting for the community and welcoming.
Past parishioner:
I find this “renovation” to be blasphemous and hypocritical. Both my children attended CTK from kindergarten thru 8th grade and although I am no longer a member of this parish I always found the sanctuary a place of beauty and peace. The fact that the current parishioners would want to raise that kind of capital and squander it on such a gaudy remodel is not what Christ has taught our children. I very much hope that this ill designed plan is thwarted by a large outcry of people who have experienced the Sacraments within the walls of this beautiful structure.
Past parishioner:
The current church is beautiful and unique and should be preserved. Why are they spending an exorbitant amount of money on re-doing it, when those funds could, and should, be used to better serve the community, what a waste.
Community member:
It was an honor to have Belluschi design this beautiful church. It’s heartbreaking that the current leadership doesn’t see its significance. My parents were members here for many years. My father’s funeral was here 30 years ago and my youngest sister was married here. I wish you great support in your efforts to preserve this unique church building.
Community member:
I sincerely disagree with the planned Beautification Plans for CTK’s church. This is a personal affront to the many that invested and supported the CTK church and its purpose over the last half century. It feels like it is being done to assuage the current pastor’s ego and is out of alignment with the needs of the church and community. In addition, it is a poor use of limited resources - the sparse design of the church was intentional and slapping Romanesque styles onto what is intended to beautifully simple is just misguided thinking and disrespectful to its founders and designers.
And, I would add, the plan to add grades 9-12 to CTK is equally misguided and a waste of limited resources when there is a well-respected and high-functioning catholic high school literally within 100 yards of the CTK site. Instead of building walls between the two schools and Romanesque features to its church to isolate itself, parish leadership should put their efforts into meaningful and win-win partnership opportunities for the two schools but I’m afraid the current pastor’s self-centeredness clouds his judgement and that of those that look up to him in that leadership role. In a time that the world needs to find unity, this leadership is focused on divisiveness that serves the minority that the pastor seeks to influence. I certainly question these decisions but more directly question the true intentions of those making these decisions. A rooted and humble leader would honor the simplicity and focus their efforts on a more important agenda that truly serves its parishioners.
Community member:
The original church is a work of art and should be preserved. Please don't paint over the wood like an old dresser.
Current parishioner:
Former K-8 CTK student
Community member:
I have visited the church and it is an astounding piece of midcentury modern architecture from Tony Belluschi. It would be completely upsetting and downright disgusting for his legacy and a great work of the Pacific Northwest to be painted over with this nonsense.
Community member:
The present church atmosphere is beautiful and calming. It invites quiet. The pictures of the proposed changes are loud and garish. They shout “look at me”. Plus, there are so many needs in the parish that could be met with this amount of money. It doesn’t reflect well on the parish to do unnecessary modifications like this.
Past parishioner:
I grew up attending CTK church. I looked at each piece of the light cross during every mass I attended. This unique art piece should be retained. "Pacific Northwest Romanesque" is the modern farmhouse of church design. Roman churches aren't covered in white paint. Don't be bamboozled by design trends that are already outdated and will ruin this unique PNW structure in the process.
Community member:
It seems they plan to change the look of this building into something it was not designed to be. Mr. Belluschi would turn over in his grave.
Past parishioner:
This is the church and community myself and my children grew up in. It’s a beautiful church just the way it is. The money could go to so many more useful things.
Community member:
I have enjoyed this stunning church for the 16 years I’ve lived in Portland. I was shocked to learn that it is not protected. Church leaders, if you desire such a makeover and have such deep pockets I beg you to buy elsewhere and leave this building for people who see its beauty.
Community member:
The building is a wonderful tribute to worship as is. Spending that kind of money to make it a worse version of other churches while removing some beautiful and significant architecture is a poor way to honor the history of the space and its larger significance to Oregon's history.
Community member:
I don't understand the reasons behind this "renovation" or "Beautification" -- the idea to spend unnecessary millions and destroy a priceless, historic masterpiece of architecture?
Architectural Heritage Center:
The Architectural Heritage Center empowers people to discover and preserve Portland’s historic and culturally significant places. The beautiful interior of Christ the King Church represents the work of one of country's most significant architectural voices and beautifully represents the merger of faith, design, art and architecture. Perhaps even more importantly, the interior of the church is indelibly connected to hundreds of formative memories and experiences for families and members of the parish. This is the space where families gathered to baptize new members of their families, celebrate the lives of their loved ones, and create a community that is bigger than just one person. Dismantling the interior dismantles an important piece of community history and squanders the beautifully designed house of worship that could be a major asset to the parish for years to come.
Community member:
A church designed by the world renowned architect, Pietro Belluschi, is a cultural treasure whose value extends far beyond the borders of its parish. It sounds like the church leaders don't know what they have: a home that is almost certainly eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places. And in addition to the travesty of garishly mucking up a masterpiece, one has to question the values and priorities of church leadership. Why in the world would you spend this huge amount of money when a lesser amount could be spent on restoration (assuming some wear and tear needs addressing) and use the rest to support your parishioners??
Granddaughter of Pietro Belluschi:
I think the design as-is stands the test of time and with a simple mid-century modesty and beauty. Couldn't this money be spent on the parishioners and people in need? Additionally, I don't think the Arches and painting over natural wood is stylish - it sounds gaudy and a step backwards. Pietro Belluschi was my grandfather, and his designs were thoughtful, peaceful and thought out. I do not think they should spend any money changing the style and should save this for better plans that will impact the lives of the parishioners.
Restore Oregon: Saving Historic Places
Restore Oregon is in support of the preservation of the Pietro Belluschi designed Christ the King church.
Brockamp and Jaeger. INC.
I work for the company that originally built this church and would like to see it remain the glorious structure that it is. Thank you
Current parishioner:
My family are members at CTK, and the beauty of this building is second to none. As an architect, I’m deeply troubled by what feels like a growing disregard for its historical significance—both in its art cross by Gyorgy Kepes and in its architecture by renowned architect Pietro Belluschi. Covering an extraordinary wood structure with “ticky-tacky” faux architectural relief isn’t an improvement; it’s a disservice. In time, I believe it will be seen as a catastrophic mistake—and a costly misuse of donor funds. CTK has something truly special, and our responsibility is to preserve it—not erase it. The families who supported the original design and construction had a clear vision, and it was not NW Romanesque. Of course, architecture can and should evolve to meet the needs of the time, including thoughtful modifications and additions that better serve the congregation. But the proposed aesthetic changes do not beautify the building; they diminish it, and they deserve to be reconsidered. My hope is simple: that the committee and the architect may not fully understand what makes this building historically significant—and that, with that significance clearly in view, they will be willing to revisit decisions that would permanently compromise its beauty.
Community member:
I am an architect, northwest architectural history professor at University of Oregon, and on many occasions attended mass in this church during high school at La Salle. It is part of my fundamental architectural memories that pointed my life towards architecture. Belluschi is the most significant modern architect of our region, and has served as a role model for most of my life, with multiple classes and trips around the region to see his churches and other buildings, the proposed modifications to this building are wrong. Architectural significance aside, I would rather see this building torn down than distastefully marred to look like something that it is not. Historically, this type of approach does not yield an environment of authenticity and the amount of resources being proposed are wasted on what one would expect to see in Las Vegas. This is a cultural aberration. If the desire is a place of worship vastly different from the existing building, it should be respectfully taken down, ideally the wood salvaged to serve other communities, and a new building built. This budget would allow for that, which would mean overall new facilities and not having to inherit problems of historic buildings of this era, as well as not disfiguring something significant. Either shift to respectfully updating what’s there, or dismantle it with dignity and start anew.
Community member:
I have had the opportunity over the years to not only listen to music being played and sung in this church but to play and sing myself. As a child I attended Christ the King school and LaSalle where services and celebrations were held in this sacred space and as an adult, have played music for weddings and funerals. I am keenly aware of the wonderful acoustics, as purposefully designed by the architect, to have sound beautifully reverberate throughout the entire room and often, without the need for amplification. This planned renovation of turning a famed architect's intent into a medieval glow up replete with pillars and white walls, seems unnecessary and excessive, more of a vanity project that even our Heavenly Father, might deem unnecessary and excessive.
Alumnus and current parent of Christ the King students:
As an alumnus and a parent of two children currently attending Christ the King, I strongly oppose the proposed project. The plan allocates $5 million toward building a new church while dedicating only $500,000 to upgrade the school into a K-12 program. This is deeply concerning. Our current gymnasium is in very poor condition, and it receives no meaningful attention. Additionally, despite having a brand-new lunchroom, the school still does not provide freshly prepared, school-made meals for students. This unbalanced approach will negatively impact the quality of education and the student experience for years to come. When parents voiced these concerns , the response was essentially that the project would move forward regardless. As a result, I am aware of multiple families who have already decided to leave CTK after this school year. I urge the leadership to reconsider these priorities and focus first on strengthening the core educational environment for our children.
Past parishioner:
My children attended CTK school, and we were parishioners for many years. I remember the community as unpretentious, authentic, and welcoming, and the parish was a warm place to worship. The current plans for renovating the church are not only unnecessary but also seem overly extravagant and lack genuine value. The proposed designs are gaudy and meretricious, cold and pretentious, failing to complement the building's existing exterior aesthetic. It is unclear who at Christ the King Catholic Church truly needs these renovations. Is this project merely the vision of a single individual? The allocation of funds for such elaborate changes raises questions about whether this is a responsible use of parish resources. Two nearby parishes, St. Peter's and St. Anne's, are in genuine need of upgrades to their facilities. Prioritizing modest improvements for these communities would be a more meaningful and equitable use of resources. It is discouraging to me, with all that is happening in our world and in our neighborhoods right now, that this is what a pastor is preoccupied with. "We have very little, so we have nothing to be preoccupied with. The more you have the more you are occupied, the less you give. But the less you have, the more free you are." -Mother Teresa
Parish family:
This church is more than just a building to me — it’s where I grew up. From kindergarten through 8th grade, it was a place that helped shape who I am today. Generations of my family have dedicated their time, energy, and love to this community. We’ve put in our blood, sweat, and tears to support it in any way we could, because it has always been a place that meant so much to us. Seeing what is happening now is incredibly heartbreaking. This church represents memories, values, and a sense of community that cannot be replaced. It has been a home not just for my family, but for so many others over the years. I truly hope we can come together to preserve something that has had such a meaningful impact on so many lives. Saving this church means preserving a legacy, a community, and a place that has brought people together for generations.
Past parishioner:
I am firmly against altering a beautiful church and completely changing its style to conform with NW Romanesque. This church has a wonderful history. It’s beautiful and full of history. The colorful cross is iconic. Why spend millions to erase the good memories people have of a beloved institution. I remember Fr. Buxman and Fr. Weber pictured at the top. Great memories as an alter server. I attended weddings and funerals, baptisms and school masses. Why erase something that isn't broken. People want a real church, presided over by a priest who is there to be the shepherd for the community. You don’t get a flock to attend mass by wasteful spending and erasing the past. You will just lose more parishioners who will move on to more accepting parishes.
Christ the King graduate and past altar server:
I attended Christ The King as a child and remember moving into the “New Church”. It meant no more mass or serving mass as an altar boy in the gym. I remember the first time seeing this mosaic as that child. Vividly. It took my breath away. Literally. So many days I served and attended mass before schools and on weekends with family. Seeing that mosaic gave me such joy, familiarity, solace and comfort every time. I needed all of that during those years. As a child it kept me looking, asking questions in my head. Yes. It did that. Please don’t tear out future generations chance at having the same thing.
Christ the King graduate and longtime parishioner:
This church is a gem as it is, the result of much, much hard work, planning and generous donations back in the 1970's.. and as mentioned below is the work of world-renowned architect Pietro Belluschi. I received the sacrament of marriage here, attended funerals of family members and friends, and my oldest child was baptized here as well. The natural finish on the wooden ceiling, beams and columns help to reflect the Spirit of God present here in sacred natural beauty. What could come closer to the essence of God than such a beautifully designed and created space.
Thank you for all your time and effort for this important cause to preserve this holy, beautiful church building.
Past parishioner:
I lived in Clackamas in the early 1980s - went to LaSalle HS. My mom was the choir director at CTK from 1981-1984. Those who worshipped together there did so in a beautiful space - that brought love and calm to the community. Our dearest friend (rest in peace) Helen Feltz, was a matron in that community and gave many hours to adding to the cross on the wall. Why redesign such a unique space to look like many other churches already in place in Portland? Destroying this CTK space will alienate the community....ending the parish as it is now. What a shame. Why not spend that money on reviving the community, hosting events to celebrate the kids and school community, hosting concerts, feeding the poor....anything would be better than pouring money into destroying a beautiful space. I pray that the community prevails in stopping the destruction of a beloved space.
Past parishioner:
My mother was the choir director for years, and worked closely with parish leadership, including Fr. Weber on the design of the church. It would be a shame to see the proposed changes go into effect.
Parents of children who graduated from Christ the King:
We are both disheartened about the plans that the current leadership has to change the authentic aesthetic and humble beauty that originally made us choose that parish for our family.
We will continue to pray that enough signatures are collected for this cause.
Third generation Legacy family graduate of Christ the King:
I'd like to sign the petition to preserve the Pietro Belluschi church as well. The original woodwork means a lot to me and my family, and I much prefer the unique and beautiful stained glass crucifix to the concept they're proposing in the renovation.
Retired teacher at our school:
Prayers for all your efforts to preserve CTK church. In some ways you are gathering those who have scattered as you collect signatures of support. I am inspired by the courage of those who have much to lose.
Christ the King graduate whose parents were parishioners and whose funerals were in our church:
I am in full support to STOP any renovations of our historic church - Christ the King Church.
Parishioner of over 50 years:
As someone who saw this church built as a legacy for my generation, it breaks my heart to see its original design altered. My family has deep roots here, with three generations of our names etched into the new parish center bricks.
The architect designed this space to reflect our community, not to mimic a traditional cathedral. Instead of a 'cosmetic upheaval,' I would love to see our funds used for practical improvements that serve everyone, like ADA accessibility, improved bathrooms, and necessary roof repairs.
Lifelong parishioner, baptized at Christ the King by Fr, Ted Weber in 1964:
I was part of the first class to be Confirmed in the new church. It was a very profound and awe-inspiring feeling to experience the Holy Spirit in such a beautiful space.
Two of my sisters were married there. We buried our dad, mom, brother, my husband, brother-in-law, mother-in-law as well as many other friends from this blessed and holy church.
I see no reason for renovations to such a sacred, traditional and holy space. Frankly, it is truly such a beautiful and special place that it is hard to not see the Father, Son and the Holy Spirit in every fiber of it.
Virtual lifelong parishioner:
Besides the sacrament of Baptism, all of my sacraments have taken place at CTK. I went to school there. I sent my child there. My grandma, sister and mom had their funeral Masses there. It represents my childhood and adulthood. It’s my home. I don’t want anyone to take that away from me. CTK is beautiful and warm. Instead of trying to change it into something it’s not, we should use that money for the poor. Spending all of that money on a, “beautification,” project is vain and sinful.
Past parishioner:
This was my parish for much of my childhood. That beautiful, glowing glass cross mural came to symbolize the beauty and simplicity of the gospel to me. So many of my memories include standing before that cross. Joy filled memories, sorrowful memories, family memories. It does not need to be "fixed" or "improved". It's actually offensive to me to think there are Chr
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.